In this news article, the author, Brendan Griffiths, discusses his experience of owning both an iPhone and a Google Pixel Fold. He expresses his belief that iPhone users are unaware of the features and benefits they are missing out on by sticking with Apple. The article highlights that the iPhone’s lack of significant innovation in recent years is noticeable, with new models offering minor changes such as different colors and minor hardware modifications. The author argues that many of the features introduced by Apple in iOS 17 have already been enjoyed by Google and Samsung users for quite some time. Additionally, the article mentions that Apple lags behind Android in certain areas, such as lacking support for WhatsApp on the Apple Watch and the ability to share an iPhone between multiple users with separate Apple accounts.
Griffiths goes on to praise Google and Samsung for their hardware innovation, particularly citing the charging dock/speaker feature of the Google Pixel Tablet and the impressive design of the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5. He suggests that it is these companies, rather than Apple, that are pushing the boundaries of hardware innovation. The article also criticizes Apple’s closed ecosystem and the difficulties users face when attempting to transfer photos from an iPhone to an Android device.
The author concludes by stating that the choice between an iPhone 13 and iPhone 15 is not a significant one, comparing it to the choice between Coke and Pepsi. He argues that Apple’s target market is not those who think differently, as Steve Jobs famously said, but rather a mass market that thinks the same. Griffiths describes the revolutionaries of the tech industry as bureaucrats and implies that Apple’s promises of innovation and groundbreaking features have not been fulfilled.
In summary, this article highlights the author’s belief that iPhone users are unaware of the features and benefits they are missing out on compared to late-model Android flagship devices. It points out the lack of significant innovation in recent iPhone models and compares Apple’s features with those already available on Android devices. Additionally, the article praises Google and Samsung for their hardware innovation and criticizes Apple’s closed ecosystem. The author concludes that the choice between iPhone models is relatively insignificant and suggests that Apple no longer targets those who think differently.