The Financial Times Editor, Roula Khalaf, curates her top stories for readers in a weekly newsletter titled the Editor’s Digest, which is available for free access.
According to recent research, only 1% of individuals who are out of the workforce due to health issues manage to secure employment within six months, despite 20% expressing a desire to work. This highlights a significant challenge for the government as it attempts to address the increasing welfare expenditure in the UK.
The Learning and Work Institute (L&W) has underscored the need for revising the financial incentives for people with illnesses and disabilities to rejoin the workforce. The institute’s findings, which were published on Tuesday, suggest that providing better support would be more effective than implementing abrupt benefit cuts. Currently, only 10% of disabled individuals receive assistance in finding work annually, a situation that reflects rising concerns among disability charities about potential short-term fiscal measures by the government that could adversely affect vulnerable populations.
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, is preparing to reveal plans aimed at overhauling health and disability benefits for working-age citizens ahead of the Spring Statement expected next month. The intended reforms are designed to both increase employment and reduce benefits spending, which has increased by 40% in real terms since 2013 and is projected to reach £100 billion annually by the decade’s end.
A considerable focus has been placed on the 3.5 million individuals receiving incapacity benefits, who have been recognized as too ill to work or seek work. This demographic has grown by one million people since the pandemic began, and they receive £5,000 more annually than those receiving basic unemployment benefits, without any obligation to seek employment.
The L&W Institute has indicated that a mix of skewed financial incentives, lack of adequate work return support, and insufficiently flexible employers has resulted in what they term a “benefit trap.” There has been an even sharper increase post-pandemic in those receiving disability benefits, or personal independence payments, which helps cover higher living costs due to health issues regardless of employment status.
Stephen Evans, CEO of the L&W Institute, warned against hasty reductions and restrictions in either benefit category without enhanced initiatives to support work reintegration. He emphasized the point that without more sensible investments now, sustainable cost-cutting will not be achieved, leaving people struggling in the future.
The previous Conservative government had aimed to limit eligibility for incapacity benefits, projecting savings of £1 billion annually between 2026-2029, a plan still accounted for in the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecasts.
Current Labour ministers are determined to demonstrate to the OBR that their reform strategies can produce similar savings. However, past welfare reforms have often failed to yield the anticipated cost reductions, causing the fiscal watchdog to approach only certain savings with confidence.
One controversial strategy under government consideration is the potential phasing out of incapacity benefits, consolidating support through personal independence payments, and revising their regulations.
The Department for Work and Pensions is striving to ensure that some savings from restricting benefits are reallocated to aid disabled individuals in gaining employment. L&W’s report advocates for annual investments of £450 million in employment support, anticipating potential savings of £4 billion annually through decreased benefit payments and increased tax revenue. This plan includes doubling the number of employment support positions and initiating quarterly discussions for incapacity benefit claimants to explore their employment options.
A government spokesperson declined to comment on the specifics of these anticipated reforms but noted that they are fundamentally aimed at genuinely supporting sick and disabled individuals in returning to work while maintaining fairness for taxpayers.